Potential Implications of U.S. Election Outcomes on Digital Asset Markets
Will Ogden Moore
Last Updated: 10/15/2024 | 19 min. read
The outcome of the U.S. elections will likely have significant implications for the digital assets industry. The next president and Congress may take up crypto-specific legislation and could make changes to tax and spending policies that affect broader financial markets.
At the constituent level, however, data show that crypto is a bipartisan issue, with slightly higher levels of Bitcoin ownership among Democrats than Republicans. Moreover, specific candidates from both parties have expressed support for crypto innovation.
Regardless of which party is in control, Grayscale Research believes that comprehensive bipartisan legislation could be the best long-term solution for the digital assets industry in the United States.
Most outcomes are characterized by high uncertainty: both polling data and prediction markets suggest a closely divided race. However, these data suggest that a shift in control of the Senate (from Democrats to Republicans) seems likely, and this could be a particularly relevant change with direct implications for the crypto industry, given the Senate’s role in confirming presidential appointments.
White House
The upshot: A Trump victory would likely imply more supportive regulators and larger budget deficits, both of which could provide tailwinds for Bitcoin and crypto. But Trump’s fiscal policy plans would require the support of Congress and tariffs could introduce market uncertainty.
Grayscale Research believes that, all else equal, large budget deficits should be considered negative for the U.S. Dollar and positive for Bitcoin over the medium term.
Exhibit 1: Neither candidate plans to shrink the federal deficit
The upshot: While members of both parties have demonstrated support for certain aspects of crypto policy, Republican control may be considered a net-positive outcome for crypto, given the Senate’s key role in confirming regulator appointments.
Democrats currently control the Senate, and therefore chair key committees, set priorities on legislation, and ultimately have the deciding vote on some presidential appointments. Given that Republicans have generally been more supportive of digital assets innovation, Grayscale Research believes that a change in control of the Senate could be a net-positive outcome for crypto markets — and arguably the most important election outcome for the industry, given the critical role of regulator oversight.
House of Representatives
The upshot: Control of the House will be critical for determining whether there is unified or divided government, which will partly determine whether the next president can achieve their stated goals for fiscal policy, and therefore the impact of the elections on broader financial markets.
Control of the House will determine committee assignments and legislative priorities for the chamber, which could have bearing on crypto policy. But perhaps the most important implication will be whether one party controls both the White House and both chambers of Congress — "unified government” — or whether control is split between parties — “divided government.” Under divided government, changes to fiscal policy may be especially difficult to achieve.
The Eight Scenarios
For the upcoming U.S. elections, there are three institutions in play (the White House, Senate, and House of Representatives) and two possible outcomes for each institution (control by Republicans or Democrats). There are therefore eight distinct possible scenarios, each with different implications for the digital assets industry. Exhibit 2 provides implied odds for each scenario from Polymarket.
Exhibit 2: According to prediction markets, the election is highly uncertain
Grayscale Research would highlight a few key points. First, among the four more likely scenarios, no one scenario clearly dominates — in other words, the post-election balance of power is still highly uncertain. Second, observers are split on whether we will have unified or divided government: the combined odds of a Democratic or Republican sweep are still close to 50%. Third, the only specific outcome with reasonably high odds, according to Polymarket, is Republican control of the Senate. As long as that holds, we would consider the election outcome to be moving in a favorable direction for crypto markets, given the key role the Senate plays in confirming presidential appointments.
Crypto is a Bipartisan Issue
That being said, Grayscale Research would consider Republican control of the Senate to be a meaningful positive for the digital assets industry, given the Senate’s key role in confirming the president’s appointees for regulatory agencies. For this reason, current polling and the implied odds from prediction markets currently point to a favorable outcome for crypto markets.
However, the outlook for any crypto-specific legislation and/or possible fiscal policy changes from the next administration is more uncertain. In Grayscale Research’s view, the best outcome for the healthy development of the digital assets industry would be a continuation of the bipartisan work towards comprehensive legislation.
Some links are for articles which may sit behind a paywall and may require a subscription to access them in full.
The survey was conducted online by The Harris Poll on behalf of Grayscale via its Harris On Demand omnibus product within the United States between September 4th and 6th, 2024 among 1,841 adults (aged 18 and over) who plan to vote in the 2024 presidential election. Data were weighted where necessary by age, gender, race/ethnicity, region, education, marital status, household size, household income, employment, and propensity to be online, to bring them in line with their actual proportions in the population. Respondents for this survey were selected from among those who have agreed to participate in our surveys. The sampling precision of Harris online polls is measured by using a Bayesian credible interval. For this study, the sample data is accurate to within +/- 2.8 percentage points using a 95% confidence level. This credible interval will be wider among subsets of the surveyed population of interest. All sample surveys and polls, whether or not they use probability sampling, are subject to other multiple sources of error which are most often not possible to quantify or estimate, including, but not limited to coverage error, error associated with nonresponse, error associated with question wording and response options, and post-survey weighting and adjustments.
[1] Grayscale takes no position as to the accuracy or reliability of polling data and implied odds from prediction markets like Polymarket. Throughout this piece, Grayscale uses data from Polymarket to suggest general directionality of potential election outcomes.
[7] On regulation, former president Trump has said, for example, “The rules will be written by people who love your industry, not hate your industry.” Source: CNBC.
[8] This statement from the CBO sums up the current budget picture: “Over the 10-year projection period, primary deficits in CBO’s baseline average 2.5 percent of GDP. In the 62 years from 1947 to 2008, primary deficits exceeded 2.5 percent of GDP only twice. In the past 15 years, though, they have exceeded that percentage 10 times—in part because of legislation enacted in response to the 2007–2009 financial crisis and in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic that began in early 2020.” Source: CBO.
[9] PWBM estimates are based on the primary (before interest) deficit; Grayscale incorporated CBO estimates of interest expense before the campaign’s proposals to calculate the total deficit impact. Estimates of the budget impact of campaign proposals differs across sources, and figures presented here should be considered illustrative. For alternative estimates see, for example, Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.
[10] PWBM estimates of the Trump proposals do not include the potential impact of tariffs on customs revenue. However, projections that do include tariff revenue, like those from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, find a broadly comparable net impact on the deficit. Estimates of the revenue impact of Trump’s tariffs plans over a ten-year period, if maintained, range from roughly $2 trillion to $5 trillion. Source: Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, Tax Policy Center, Tax Foundation.
[12] Changing tariffs does not typically require Congressional approval.
[13] Specific bills are the Digital Commodities Consumer Protection Act of 2022 (S.4760) and the Lummis-Gillibrand Payment Stablecoin Act (S.4155).
[14] The Stand With Crypto Alliance is a 501(c)(4) nonprofit funded by donations. Grayscale takes no position as to the accuracy or reliability of data from The Stand With Crypto Alliance. Throughout this piece, Grayscale uses data from The Stand With Crypto Alliance to suggest general directionality of where members of Congress stand with respect to crypto policy.
[15] Counting independent senators who caucus with Democrats.
[16] SAB 121 is a financial guideline requiring companies to report customer-held crypto as both assets and liabilities, affecting how they manage crypto custody services.
[17] Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act (H.R.4763).
[18] Across the three waves of polling, 18% of self-identified Democrats said they owned Bitcoin, compared to 15% of Republicans. Similarly, 51% of Democrats said they were “very familiar” or “somewhat familiar” with crypto, compared to 45% of Republicans. Lastly, in the third wave of polling (September 4-6, 2024), 37% of Democrats said they have become moreopen to learning more about investing in crypto this year, compared to 30% of Republicans. Source: The Harris Poll.
Important Information
Investments in digital assets are speculative investments that involve high degrees of risk, including a partial or total loss of invested funds. Investments in digital assets are not suitable for any investor that cannot afford loss of the entire investment.
All content is original and has been researched and produced by Grayscale Investments, LLC (“Grayscale”) unless otherwise stated herein. No part of this content may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without the express consent of Grayscale.
This information should not be relied upon as research, investment advice, or a recommendation regarding any products, strategies, or any investment in particular. This material is strictly for illustrative, educational, or informational purposes and is subject to change. This content does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to sell or buy any security in any jurisdiction where such an offer or solicitation would be illegal. There is not enough information contained in this content to make an investment decision and any information contained herein should not be used as a basis for this purpose.
This content does not constitute a recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situations, or needs of investors.
Investors are not to construe this content as legal, tax or investment advice, and should consult their own advisors concerning an investment in digital assets. The price and value of assets referred to in this content and the income from them may fluctuate. Past performance is not indicative of the future performance of any assets referred to herein. Fluctuations in exchange rates could have adverse effects on the value or price of, or income derived from, certain investments.
Certain of the statements contained herein may be statements of future expectations and other forward-looking statements that are based on Grayscale’s views and assumptions and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results, performance, or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in such statements. In addition to statements that are forward-looking by reason of context, the words “may, will, should, could, can, expects, plans, intends, anticipates, believes, estimates, predicts, potential, projected, or continue” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Grayscale assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements contained herein and you should not place undue reliance on such statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. Although Grayscale has taken reasonable care to ensure that the information contained herein is accurate, no representation or warranty (including liability towards third parties), expressed or implied, is made by Grayscale as to its accuracy, reliability, or completeness. You should not make any investment decisions based on these estimates and forward-looking statements.
There is no guarantee that the market conditions during the past period will be present in the future. Rather, it is most likely that the future market conditions will differ significantly from those of this past period, which could have a materially adverse impact on future returns. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN. PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. We selected the timeframe for our analysis because we believe it broadly constitutes the most complete historical dataset for the digital assets that we have chosen to analyze.
Share This
Like what you see?
Subscribe below for the latest research from Grayscale.
